That, whereas the Executive Council and Board of Management of M.S.C.C. in Joint Session at Ottawa in 1961 has taken the following action:
"Without jeopardizing the present overseas commitments of The Anglican Church of Canada in the following Provinces and Dioceses of the Anglican Communion:
The Church of India, Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon
The Holy Catholic Church in Japan
The Archbishopric in Jerusalem
The Church of Uganda Ruanda [sic i.e. Rwanda] Urundi
The Church of the Province of the West Indies
The Diocese of Hong Kong
The Diocese of Accra
The Diocese of Malaya and Singapore, and
The Diocese of Madras in the Church of South India.
It is recommended that the Executive Committee of the Department of Missions of The Anglican Church of Canada be empowered to receive and consider, within the limitations of its Annual Budget appropriations, such appeals for personnel and funds for work in the Anglican Communion as are directed to the Department of Missions of The Anglican Church of Canada by the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy of the Anglican Communion."
It is therefore recommended that as funds become available in the next triennium, the Department of Missions give priority in its overseas commitments to accepting increased appeals from the Church of India, Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon; The Church of Uganda Ruanda Urandi, and the Church of the Province of the West Indies for the following purposes:
(i) To provide assistance in the training and support of national clergy and lay workers.
(ii) To recruit and train overseas personnel in response to requests from overseas Diocesan Bishops.
(iii) To provide financial assistance for capital needs in the areas of church extension and theological education. CARRIED in both Houses.
That the National Executive Council recommends that the Anglican Communion Missionary Strategy Committee be expanded to include an executive group of experienced missionary leaders representative of regional life of the Communion and available to the Executive Officer for consultation and for the recommendation of policy and planning in Mission to the authority of the Committee on Missionary Strategy. CARRIED
Notes
This resolution is to be forwarded to the Lambeth Conference.
Act No. 78: Requesting the National Executive Council to refer motion (re additional funds for Information and Stewardship to have representative accompany Bishop Dean) to appropriate Committee for consideration and report (See Sept. 2 minutes, p.3)
That this National Executive Council request the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy and the Lambeth Consultative Body to give serious attention to the provision of a realistic budget for the office of the Executive Officer, including administration, travel, information services, and other programme items. CARRIED
File consists of 44 photos mostly from Fort George, but also includes Moose Factory, Fort Chimo and Herschel Island. Includes some Indian Residential School photos.
File consists of oversize size copies of confirmation records.
Places include: Ungava, George River (Kangiqsualujjuaq), Fort Chimo (Kuujjuaq), False River, Kootlotook, Koksoak, Aloleek, Kotaluk (Leaf River), Port Burwell, Kasegeaksevik, Mukalik, and Payne Bay.
"In this report -- more accurately a 'working paper' -- I make proposals for the next stage of development of the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy. Although I take full and personal responsibility for the proposals, I want to acknowledge with great gratitude the counsel and help given by a number of colleagues. .... To my thanks, let me add a few preliminary comments. First, these proposals are complementary to others which deal specifically with the Executive Officer's office and staff. .... The fact that the Executive Officer serves two bodies, and that separate groups of interest are involved, should however be kept in mind. A number of suggestions have been made, for example, which really relate to the Lambeth Consultative Body rather than the ACMS. .... Second, there have been -- indeed there still are -- some troubling misconceptions about my own office, and about the ACMS. I mention now four of these, because I think it is useful to clear away as much of the underbrush as possible before we tackle the main issues. The first has to do with 'authority' or 'power' of the ACMS and its Executive Officer. As I wrote to Archbishop Fisher in 1959, when we were exploring all this, it is essential in my view, that the Executive Officer have no constitutional or coercive authority. .... A second apprehension is related to this -- it has to do with money. .... Then, third, there has been a tendency to think of the ACMS as a means by which something is to be done for somebody else. .... Finally (and no doubt in large part because membership of the ACMS is by churches), there had been a measure of apprehension lest it represent a decision by the Anglican Communion against the 'society' principle of missionary support. .... So much by way of clearing the ground. Now I should like to speak about the four main principles which seem to me to be the determining elements in any planning for the ACMS". -- Intro.
Contents: Introduction / Stephen F. Bayne, Jr. -- I: Principles -- II: Practical Necessities -- III: Specific Proposals / Stephen F. Bayne, Jr.
Note printed on verso of t.-p.: "N.B. This document is confidential, until released by the Executive Officer. It is intended for circulation and discussion by the members of the Lambeth Consultative Body and the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy, and such advisory and other persons only as are designated to receive it. It has no official standing or authority save as may be given it by appropriate action. Its use for general public discussion is not authorized".
"An important sector of my work, these three and a half years, has been the exploration of this new office, its usefulness and its needs. I'm sure that none who supported the proposal at Lambeth, 1958, would have felt able to give more than a partial job description, at best. .... It was understood, I felt, that one of my first duties must be to explore what was required and what was appropriate, if the hopes of the bishops were to be fulfilled. What I now present is is the result of that exploration, at least as far as specific recommendations for the next stage in the development of this office, and the reasons for them. I add four prefatory notes. First, this paper should be read in conjunction with the parallel proposals on the structure of the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy. Second I would hope that it might be read as having the least possible personal reference to myself. .... The third comment is really only to underline the word 'appropriate' as used two paragraphs before. .... Finally, I believe it is not yet possible to think of the Executive Officer as a position rather than a person." -- Intro.
Contents: Introduction / Stephen F. Bayne, Jr. -- I: Questions -- II: Summary / Stephen F. Bayne, Jr.
Note printed on verso of t.-p.: "N.B. This document is confidential, until released by the Executive Officer. It is intended for circulation and discussion by the members of the Lambeth Consultative Body and the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy, and such advisory and other persons only as are designated to receive it. It has no official standing or authority save as may be given it by appropriate action. Its use for general public discussion is not authorized".
1. From Canon A.H. Davis (M.S.C.C.) requesting advice form the House of Bishops to M.S.C.C. and W.A. on the status of Canadian Missionary personnel if the Anglican Communion were not in Communion wth the proposed Church of North India.
The House gave consideration to a document on Partnership with United Churches which had been adopted in Huron in August by the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy.
Text
"That we refer the Document on Partnership to the Executive Council asking for general approval in principle, and that a Committee of Executive Council be appointed to consider details and report."
Notes
The Document is printed below:
PARTNERSHIP WITH UNITED CHURCHES
Anglican provinces and dioceses in many parts of the world are included in plans for united churches in their areas. Where such a scheme of Church unity is approved by the province concerned, the contribution brought to it by Anglicans should be in every way whole-hearted and as complete as possible.
In the case of capital and development funds, for example, which are designed to enable the existing province or diocese to fulfil its calling and bear more worthy witness to its tradition, it is our conviction that all of this strength, now thought of as an "Anglican" resource should be brought to the united church. Anglican contributions from outside the area in question, whether financial or personal, should not be lessened because of the participation of the church in unity schemes. Proper steps should be taken to insure to the province or diocese concerned legal continuity and identity, and thus enable them to accept the responsibilities of new and fuller brotherhood.
We respectfully urge the churches of the Anglican Communion to give such assurance to our provinces.
(Prepared and forwarded by the Missionary Executives' Conference. Adopted by the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy, August 6, 1963.)
2. From Canon A.H. Davis (M.S.C.C.) enclosing a Document on th Canonical Status of Overseas Missionaries which had been prepared by a Committee chaired by Bishop Wilkinson. This Document has won approval from the Missionary Executives present at the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy at its meeting at Huron College from July 29th to August 5th.
Text
"That General approval be given to the Document dealing with Episcopal Jurisdiction of Overseas Missionaries."
Notes
The Document is printed below-
Your Committee studied the revised Canon VIII of the Pension Board and also Canon XXI of General Synod "Transfer of Clergy" and in particular the section dealing with "Jurisdiction". "A Clergyman shall be regarded as subject to the Episcopal Jurisdiction of the Bishop on whose register his name has been entered until he has been removed from such register by transfer to another Diocese."
Your Sub-Committee, on motion of Principal Morden and Professor Prior, recommend that the following policy be adopted by the Executive Committee of the Department of Missions, after consultation with the House of Bishops and or General Synod:
1) "That a Missionary Priest going overseas on short term service retain his license in his Canadian Diocese at the pleasure of the Bishop and seek only "Permission to Officiate" in the overseas Diocese to which he goes."
2) "That a Missionary Priest going for service longer than three years relinquish his licence in his Canadian Diocese and be transferred to the jurisdiction of an Overseas Diocesan Bishop."
3) "That a missionary priest be given "status" in a Canadian Diocese as serving on Missionary Leave in an Overseas Diocese of the anglican Communion, such "status" to be interpreted as meaning:
a) Being officially recognized as an Anglican Church of Canada Missionary serving with the Deparment of Missions of the General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada.
b) The Pensionable benefits of said person being assured under Canon VIII of General Synod.
c) That continuing identification be established between his Canadian Diocese and the Overseas Missionary Priest during his period of overseas service and on his return to Canada.
It was moved and seconded that any reports from the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy be sent by the M.S.C.C. to the appropriate General Synod Committees. CARRIED.
That subsection (c) of the resolution passed at Montebello concerning the Secretary of the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy be made effective in such manner as to indicate the sources and details of income as well as expenditure. CARRIED.
That we request the Primate to discuss with the Advisory Council on Missionary Strategy the adoption of a title for Bishop Bayne which would be more appropriate than "Executive Officer", and which would more properly describe the great task he is performing for the Anglican Communion. CARRIED.